Dudley v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan
Seylon Dudley |
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Foundation and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan |
4:2022cv11441 |
June 27, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Shalina D Kumar |
Elizabeth A Stafford |
Labor: Fair Standards |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER ACCEPTING STIPULATION REGARDING PROPER NAME OF DEFENDANT AND FIRST RESPONSIVE PLEADING. Signed by District Judge Shalina D. Kumar. (LHos) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for *Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Foundation* (SKra) |
A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (SKra) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Kara Krause on behalf of Seylon Dudley. (Krause, Kara) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Seylon Dudley against Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Foundation with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8960540 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Wayne - County Where Action Arose: Wayne - County of 1st Defendant: Wayne. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Hurwitz, Noah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.