Hooks v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
James Hooks |
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company |
2:2022cv11568 |
July 11, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
David R. Grand |
Nancy G Edmunds |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 1/3/2023; Dispositive Motion Cut-off set for 2/3/2023; Final Pretrial Order Due 5/9/2023; Final Pretrial Conference set for 5/16/2023 @ 2:00 PM before District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds; and Trailing Trial Docket set for 6/6/2023 @ 9:00 am - Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (Refer to image for additional dates) (LBar) |
TEXT-ONLY NOTICE: Telephone Scheduling Conference set for on August 22, 2022 is Cancelled re #6 Notice to Appear (LBar) |
Filing 7 DISCOVERY plan jointly filed pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(f) (Budaj, Steven) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE: Scheduling Conference set for 8/22/2022 @ 9:30 AM before District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds **JOINT DISCOVERY PLAN TO BE FILED BY AUGUST 15, 2022 (LBar) |
Filing 5 ORDER re #3 Attorney Substitution. Attorney Benjamin M. Glazebrook for State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company added. Attorney Michael W. Slater terminated - Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (LBar) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses with Jury Demand by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Glazebrook, Benjamin) |
Filing 3 ATTORNEY SUBSTITUTION for State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company: Benjamin M. Glazebrook added. (Glazebrook, Benjamin) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Steven T. Budaj on behalf of James Hooks. (Budaj, Steven) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company from Wayne County Circuit Court, case number 22-006718-NF. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8974797 - Fee: $ 402 [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit) (Slater, Michael) |
A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (LGra) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hooks v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: James Hooks | |
Represented By: | Steven T. Budaj |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company | |
Represented By: | Michael W. Slater |
Represented By: | Benjamin M. Glazebrook |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.