Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan v. Corizon Health, Inc.
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan |
Corizon Health, Inc. |
2:2022cv11598 |
July 14, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Mark A Goldsmith |
Elizabeth A Stafford |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 Breach of Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER REFERRING OTHER MATTERS to Magistrate Judge Stafford : Settlement Conference to be scheduled at least 30-days before the deadline for the Joint Final Pretrial Order. Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (KSan) |
Filing 7 CASE MANAGEMENT AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 3/2/2023, Dispositive Motion Cut-off set for 3/16/2023, Final Pretrial Conference set for 8/7/2023 03:30 PM before District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith, Bench Trial set for 8/21/2023 08:30 AM before District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (Refer to image for additional dates) (KSan) |
Minute Entry for telephonic proceedings before District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith: Telephonic Scheduling Conference held on 8/18/2022. (Court Reporter: None Present, Not on the Record) (KSan) |
Filing 6 DISCOVERY plan jointly filed pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(f) (Korovesis, Phillip) |
Filing 5 ORDER REGARDING TELEPHONIC SCHEDULING CONFERENCE, ( TELEPHONIC Scheduling Conference set for 8/18/2022 03:00 PM before District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith) Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (DTof) |
Filing 4 ORDER REGARDING REMOVAL. Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (DTof) |
Filing 3 ORDER Regarding Filings. Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (KWin) |
Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by Corizon Health, Inc.. (Korovesis, Phillip) |
A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DPer) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Corizon Health, Inc. from Macomb County Circuit Court, case number 2022-002172-CB. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8979507 - Fee: $ 402 [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. State Court Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit B. Declaration of Scott King) (Korovesis, Phillip) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan v. Corizon Health, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan | |
Represented By: | Aaron G. Sybesma |
Represented By: | Paul Wilk, Jr |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Corizon Health, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Phillip C. Korovesis |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.