Knight v. City of Detroit et al
| James Knight |
| City of Detroit, Herman King, JOHN DOE 1 and JOHN DOE 2 |
| 2:2022cv11678 |
| July 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Terrence G Berg |
| Curtis Ivy |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued for *Herman King* (DPer) |
| REQUEST for SUMMONS for Herman King. (Mungo, Leonard) |
| Filing 3 AMENDED ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses with Jury Demand by City of Detroit. (Brooks, Robyn) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses with Jury Demand by City of Detroit. (Brooks, Robyn) |
| A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (NAhm) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by City of Detroit from Wayne County Circuit Court, case number 22-001152-NO. Receipt No: AMIEDC-8988681 - Fee: $ 402 [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Brooks, Robyn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
