Shoops v. Social Security
Plaintiff: Michael John Shoops
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 2:2022cv11735
Filed: July 27, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Bernard A Friedman
Referring Judge: Curtis Ivy
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 NOTICE of Change of Address/Contact Information by Lisa G. Smoller on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security. (Smoller, Lisa)
August 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Lisa G. Smoller on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security. (Smoller, Lisa)
August 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Social Security Administration served on 8/2/2022. (Kaiser, Ryan)
August 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. U.S. Attorney General served on 8/4/2022. (Kaiser, Ryan)
August 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. U.S. Attorney on behalf of Michael John Shoops served on 8/4/2022, answer due 10/3/2022. (Kaiser, Ryan)
July 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 SUMMONS Issued for *Commissioner of Social Security* (TTho)
July 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Jason M. Turkish on behalf of Michael John Shoops. (Turkish, Jason)
July 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER Granting #2 Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge Curtis Ivy, Jr. (MacKay, K)
July 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE of Referral of Social Security Case to Magistrate Judge Curtis Ivy, Jr. (LGra)
July 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 APPLICATION to Proceed without prepaying fees or costs by Michael John Shoops. (Kaiser, Ryan)
July 27, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Michael John Shoops against Commissioner of Social Security. Plaintiff requests summons issued. IFP Application to Follow. County of 1st Plaintiff: Shiawassee County - County Where Action Arose: Genesee - County of 1st Defendant: USA. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): E.D. Michigan, 18-cv-10444, Judge Nancy G. Edmunds] (Kaiser, Ryan)
July 27, 2022 Opinion or Order A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (LGra)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shoops v. Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael John Shoops
Represented By: Jason M. Turkish
Represented By: Ryan Thomas Kaiser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Lisa G. Smoller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?