Johnson v. Legacy Staffing LLC et al
Robert W. Johnson |
Legacy Staffing LLC, Ohio Civil Rights Commission, Charlie Winburn, Madhu Singh, Mike DeWine, Lori Barreras, J. Rita McNeil Danish, William Patmon, III, Angela Phelps-White, Judy Nystrom, Kathy G. O'Dell and Vera F. Boggs |
2:2022cv11757 |
July 29, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Jonathan JC Grey |
George Caram Steeh |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Certificate of Service re #7 Notice of Appeal. (SSch) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEAL re #6 Judgment, #5 Order on Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. Fee Status: No Fee Paid. (SSch) |
Filing 6 JUDGMENT. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (BSau) |
Filing 5 ORDER Granting #2 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Dismissing Complaint. Signed by District Judge George Caram Steeh. (BSau) |
TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #6 Judgment, #5 Order on Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs mailed to Robert W. Johnson at 112 Court St., Apt. 2, Watertown, NY 13601. (BSau) |
Filing 3 REQUEST to change venue by Robert W. Johnson. (DPer) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION to proceed without prepaying fees or costs by Robert W. Johnson. (DPer) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Robert W. Johnson against defendants (DPer) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.