Johnson v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Jacqueline Sue Johnson |
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company |
2:2022cv11779 |
August 2, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Sean F Cox |
Anthony P Patti |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A. |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 NOTICE TO APPEAR IN PERSON: Scheduling Conference set for 11/8/2022 at 01:00PM before District Judge Sean F. Cox (Zaidel, B) |
Filing 7 ORDER Regarding Motion for Temporary Restraining Order/Preliminary Injunction re #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC) |
Filing 6 STIPULATED ORDER that Plan Benefits Shall not be Disbursed until Future Order from the Court. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (BSau) |
Filing 5 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Jeffrey Robert May appearing on behalf of Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Certificate of Service (May, Jeffrey) |
Set/Reset Scheduling Order Deadlines: TELEPHONIC Status Conference reset for 8/26/2022 at 04:00PM (time change only) before District Judge Sean F. Cox Same call in information as on original Notice should be used. (Zaidel, B) |
Minute Entry for telephonic proceedings before District Judge Sean F. Cox: Telephonic Status Conference held on 8/26/2022. Disposition: Parties to submit a stipulation and proposed order by 8/29/2022. (Court Reporter: None Present, Not on the Record) (JMcC) |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE: Status Conference set for 8/26/2022 at 03:30 PM before District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by Metropolitan Life Insurance Comp[any by All Defendants. (Czapski, Michelle)[ANSWER TO PETITION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND SHOW CAUSE ORDER] Modified on 8/23/2022 (DPer). |
Filing 2 STIPULATION AND ORDER Extending Time for Defendant to Respond re #1 Notice of Removal (Complaint). (Responsive Pleading due by 8/23/2022) Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company from Wayne County Probate Court, case number 2022-875499-DE. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9002033 - Fee: $ 402 [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A - Wayne County Probate Court Pleadings) (Czapski, Michelle) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Johnson v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Jacqueline Sue Johnson | |
Represented By: | Michael Caine |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Metropolitan Life Insurance Company | |
Represented By: | Michelle Thurber Czapski |
Represented By: | Jeffrey Robert May |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.