Deering v. Oakland County et al
Juwan Deering |
Oakland County, David Wurtz, Denise Reis, William Harvey, Gregory Townsend, Ralph McMorris, Phillip Turner and Raymond Jeffries |
2:2022cv11809 |
August 4, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Mark A Goldsmith |
Jonathan JC Grey |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 NOTICE of Appearance by Layla Rose Sizemore on behalf of William Harvey. (Sizemore, Layla) |
Filing 20 NOTICE of Appearance by Trevor S. Potter on behalf of William Harvey. (Potter, Trevor) |
Filing 19 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert C. Clark on behalf of William Harvey. (Clark, Robert) |
Filing 18 NOTICE of Appearance by Steven M. Potter on behalf of William Harvey. (Potter, Steven) |
Filing 17 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. William Harvey served on 9/19/2022, answer due 10/11/2022. (Garrison, Trevor) |
Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Layla Rose Sizemore on behalf of Oakland County, Denise Reis, David Wurtz. (Sizemore, Layla) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Trevor S. Potter on behalf of Oakland County, Denise Reis, David Wurtz. (Potter, Trevor) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert C. Clark on behalf of Oakland County, Denise Reis, David Wurtz. (Clark, Robert) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Steven M. Potter on behalf of Oakland County, Denise Reis, David Wurtz. (Potter, Steven) |
Filing 12 STIPULATED ORDER to Extend Time for Defendant Gregory Townsend to File His First Responsive Pleading or Motion Pursuant to FRCP Rule 12(B)(6). Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (KSan) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by David W. Jones on behalf of Gregory Townsend. (Jones, David) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Lindsey R. Johnson on behalf of Gregory Townsend. (Johnson, Lindsey) |
Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Gregory Townsend served on 9/2/2022, answer due 9/23/2022. (Garrison, Trevor) |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Phillip Turner served on 8/24/2022, answer due 9/14/2022. (Garrison, Trevor) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to complaint by Phillip Turner. (document titled a motion) (DPer) |
Filing 6 ORDER Regarding Filings. Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (KSan) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Oakland County served on 8/9/2022, answer due 8/30/2022. (Garrison, Trevor) |
Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Denise Reis waiver sent on 8/5/2022, answer due 10/4/2022. (Garrison, Trevor) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael R. Dezsi on behalf of Juwan Deering. (Dezsi, Michael) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for * All Defendants * (TTho) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Juwan Deering against All Defendants with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9005233 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Oakland - County Where Action Arose: Oakland - County of 1st Defendant: Oakland. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Garrison, Trevor) |
A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (TTho) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.