Larrain v. Leapers Inc.
| Sehyla Larrain |
| Leapers Inc. |
| 2:2022cv12088 |
| September 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| David R. Grand |
| Laurie J Michelson |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
SCHEDULING ORDER: Interim Status Conference set for 1/18/2023 at 02:00 PM before District Judge Laurie J. Michelson; Expert Discovery due by 5/29/2023; and Dispositive Motion Cut-off set for 6/30/2023. Signed by District Judge Laurie J. Michelson. (Refer to image for additional dates) (EPar)
|
| Minute Entry for telephonic proceedings before District Judge Laurie J. Michelson: Telephonic Scheduling Conference held on 10/26/2022. (Court Reporter: None Present, Not on the Record) (EPar) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE by Leapers Inc. of Joint Notice of Non-Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction (Hazimi, Zainab) |
| Filing 8 DISCOVERY plan jointly filed pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(f) (Hazimi, Zainab) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER TO ATTEND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMISSION OF DISCOVERY PLAN. (TELEPHONIC Scheduling Conference set for 10/26/2022 at 11:00 AM before District Judge Laurie J. Michelson) Signed by District Judge Laurie J. Michelson. (EPar)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER Regarding Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Signed by District Judge Laurie J. Michelson. (EPar)
|
| Filing 5 AMENDED ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses and Reliance Upon Jury Demand by Leapers Inc.. (Hazimi, Zainab) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses and Reliance Upon Jury Demand by Leapers Inc.. (Hazimi, Zainab) |
| Filing 3 CASE MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS. (EPar) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Leapers Inc.* (DAll) |
| A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DAll) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Sehyla Larrain against All Defendants with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9041970 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Wayne - County Where Action Arose: Wayne - County of 1st Defendant: Wayne. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Frankie, Eric) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Larrain v. Leapers Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sehyla Larrain | |
| Represented By: | Eric I. Frankie |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Leapers Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Zainab Sabbagh Hazimi |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
