BAE Industries, Inc. v. Agrati - Medina, LLC et al
| BAE Industries, Inc. |
| Agrati - Medina, LLC and Agrati - Tiffin, LLC |
| 2:2022cv12134 |
| September 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Linda V Parker |
| Elizabeth A Stafford |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
TRANSCRIPT of Motion for TRO held on 09-19-2022. (Court Reporter/Transcriber: Sheila D. Rice) (Number of Pages: 46) The parties have 21 days to file with the court and Court Reporter/Transcriber a Redaction Request of this transcript. If no request is filed, the transcript may be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 days. Redaction Request due 10/14/2022. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 10/24/2022. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 12/22/2022. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date, the transcript is publicly available. (Rice, Sheila)
|
|
Filing 17
AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S #5 MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Signed by District Judge Linda V. Parker. (AFla)
|
|
Filing 16
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S #5 MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Signed by District Judge Linda V. Parker. (AFla)
|
|
Minute Entry for virtual proceedings before District Judge Linda V. Parker: Motion Hearing held on 9/19/2022 re #5 Emergency MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause Why a Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue, or in the Alternative, an Expedited Preliminary Injunction Hearing filed by BAE Industries, Inc. Disposition: Motion taken under advisement (Court Reporter: Sheila Rice) (AFla)
|
|
Filing 15
NOTICE OF VIDEO CONFERENCE HEARING on #5 Emergency MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause Why a Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue, or in the Alternative, an Expedited Preliminary Injunction Hearing. Motion Hearing set for 9/19/2022 11:30 AM before District Judge Linda V. Parker. |Zoom Webinar Information: https://www.zoomgov.com/j/1613661319?pwd=NHo0dGh6R3dtcE9TbHBqSzUrb3p1Zz09 Passcode: 140205 Or One tap mobile : US: +16692545252,,1613661319# or +16468287666,,1613661319#| (AFla)
|
|
Filing 14
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Agrati - Medina, LLC waiver sent on 9/11/2022, answer due 11/10/2022. (Struble, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 13
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Agrati - Tiffin, LLC waiver sent on 9/11/2022, answer due 11/10/2022. (Struble, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 12
REPLY to Response re #5 Emergency MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause Why a Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue, or in the Alternative, an Expedited Preliminary Injunction Hearing filed by BAE Industries, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits Index, #2 Exhibit Exhibit, #3 Exhibit Exhibit) (Struble, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 11
STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by All Defendants (Miller, Vanessa)
|
|
Filing 10
RESPONSE to #5 Emergency MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause Why a Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue, or in the Alternative, an Expedited Preliminary Injunction Hearing filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Document Continuation Declaration of B. Jennings, #2 Index of Exhibits, #3 Exhibit 1. Terms and Conditions, #4 Exhibit 2. BAE Price List, #5 Exhibit 3. Powerpoint Presentation) (Miller, Vanessa)
|
|
Minute Entry for telephonic proceedings before District Judge Linda V. Parker: Telephonic Status Conference held on 9/12/2022. Plaintiff's reply brief due on September 13, 2022. (Court Reporter: None Present, Not on the Record) (AFla)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE: Status Conference set for 9/12/2022 11:00 AM before District Judge Linda V. Parker. (AFla)
|
|
Filing 8
ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Irina Kashcheyeva appearing on behalf of Agrati - Medina, LLC, Agrati - Tiffin, LLC (Kashcheyeva, Irina)
|
|
Filing 7
ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Vanessa L. Miller appearing on behalf of Agrati - Medina, LLC, Agrati - Tiffin, LLC (Miller, Vanessa)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel N. Sharkey on behalf of BAE Industries, Inc.. (Sharkey, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 5
Emergency MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause Why a Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue, or in the Alternative, an Expedited Preliminary Injunction Hearing by BAE Industries, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit 1: Declaration of Melynn Zylka, #3 Exhibit 2: Purchase Orders, #4 Exhibit 3: BAE Terms & Conditions, #5 Exhibit 4: Agrati letter dated December 7, 2021, #6 Exhibit 5: BAE letter dated May 22, 2022, #7 Exhibit 6: Agrati email dated June 14, 2021, #8 Exhibit 7: Agrati email dated February 3, 2022, #9 Exhibit 8: BAE letter dated June 17, 2022, #10 Exhibit 9: Agrati letter dated June 23, 2022, #11 Exhibit 10: Agrati letter dated August 30, 2022, #12 Exhibit 11: Revised Purchase Orders, #13 Exhibit 12: BAE email dated August 31, 2022, #14 Exhibit 13: Agrati email dated September 1, 2022, #15 Exhibit 14: Agrati email dated September 7, 2022, #16 Exhibit 15: Cooper-Standard Automotive Inc v Daikin Am, Inc, #17 Exhibit 16: Chainworks v Webco Indus, Inc, #18 Exhibit 17: Unpublished case law) (Struble, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 4
SUMMONS Issued for *Agrati - Tiffin, LLC* (SKra)
|
|
Filing 3
SUMMONS Issued for *Agrati - Medina, LLC* (SKra)
|
|
Filing 2
STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by BAE Industries, Inc. (Struble, Christopher)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT for Specific Performance, Injunctive Relief, and Money Damages filed by BAE Industries, Inc. against All Defendants. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9048005 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Oakland - County Where Action Arose: Oakland - County of 1st Defendant: Medina, Ohio. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit 1: Purchase Orders, #3 Exhibit 2: BAE Terms & Conditions, #4 Exhibit 3: Agrati letter dated December 7, 2021, #5 Exhibit 4: BAE letter dated May 22, 2022, #6 Exhibit 5: Agrati email dated June 14, 2021, #7 Exhibit 6: Agrati email dated February 3, 2022, #8 Exhibit 7: BAE letter dated June 17, 2022, #9 Exhibit 8: Agrati letter dated June 23, 2022, #10 Exhibit 9: Agrati letter dated August 30, 2022, #11 Exhibit 10: Revised Purchase Orders, #12 Exhibit 11: BAE email dated August 31, 2022, #13 Exhibit 12: Agrati email dated September 1, 2022, #14 Exhibit 13: Agrati email dated September 7, 2022) (Struble, Christopher)
|
|
A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (SKra)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
