Ward v. Leadec Corp et al
Enrico Ward |
Leadec Corp, Manpower of Indiana Limited Partnership and Manpower Staffing Services |
2:2022cv12196 |
September 16, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Jonathan JC Grey |
Matthew F Leitman |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 451 Employment Discrimination |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Lauren Harrington on behalf of Leadec Corp. (Harrington, Lauren) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by Leadec Corp. (Lushnat, Joshua) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Leadec Corp, Manpower Staffing Services, Manpower of Indiana Limited Partnership* (SKra) |
A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (SKra) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Enrico Ward against All Defendants with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9057875 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Macomb - County Where Action Arose: Macomb - County of 1st Defendant: Macomb. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Malhiot, Caitlin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.