Vantuyl v. Lafontaine Buick GMC of Ann Arbor, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Jill Vantuyl
Defendant: Lafontaine Buick GMC of Ann Arbor, Inc. and Skopos Financial, LLC
Case Number: 2:2022cv12235
Filed: September 21, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Paul D Borman
Referring Judge: Curtis Ivy
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Fraud-Motor Vehicle (Odometer)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 16, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Ward M. Powers on behalf of Lafontaine Buick GMC of Ann Arbor, Inc.. (Powers, Ward)
October 28, 2022 Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #9 Sealed Document - Other by Skopos Financial, LLC (Frank, Lori)
October 28, 2022 Filing 9 SEALED Disclosure re #8 Order Requiring Responsive Pleading, #7 Statement of Disclosure of Corporate Affiliations by Skopos Financial, LLC. (Frank, Lori)
October 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANT LLC TO DISCLOSE INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS Response due by 10/28/2022 Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DTof)
October 17, 2022 Filing 7 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Skopos Financial, LLC (Frank, Lori)
October 17, 2022 Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by Skopos Financial, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service) (Frank, Lori)
October 6, 2022 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Skopos Financial, LLC served on 9/26/2022, answer due 10/17/2022. (Taub, Adam)
October 6, 2022 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Lafontaine Buick GMC of Ann Arbor, Inc. served on 9/29/2022, answer due 10/20/2022. (Taub, Adam)
September 22, 2022 Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for *Skopos Financial, LLC* (LGra)
September 22, 2022 Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Lafontaine Buick GMC of Ann Arbor, Inc.* (LGra)
September 21, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Jill Vantuyl against Lafontaine Buick GMC of Ann Arbor, Inc., Skopos Financial, LLC with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9063332 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Livingston - County Where Action Arose: Washtenaw - County of 1st Defendant: Washtenaw. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Taub, Adam)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vantuyl v. Lafontaine Buick GMC of Ann Arbor, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jill Vantuyl
Represented By: Adam G. Taub
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lafontaine Buick GMC of Ann Arbor, Inc.
Represented By: Ward M. Powers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Skopos Financial, LLC
Represented By: Lori J. Frank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?