Snead v. Resident Verify, LLC
Lakita Snead |
Resident Verify, LLC |
2:2022cv12257 |
September 23, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Laurie J Michelson |
Elizabeth A Stafford |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Other Responsive Pleading (Unopposed) by Resident Verify, LLC. (Atallah, John) |
TEXT-ONLY ORDER: The Court GRANTS defendant's unopposed #10 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Other Responsive Pleading. (Response due by 11/28/2022) Issued by District Judge Laurie J. Michelson. (EPar) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Christi A. Lawson on behalf of Resident Verify, LLC. (Lawson, Christi) |
TEXT-ONLY ORDER: The Court GRANTS Defendant's Unopposed #8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Other Responsive Pleading. (Response due by 11/14/2022) Issued by District Judge Laurie J. Michelson. (EPar) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Other Responsive Pleading (Unopposed) by Resident Verify, LLC. (Atallah, John) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by John J. Atallah on behalf of Resident Verify, LLC. (Atallah, John) |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Resident Verify, LLC served on 10/3/2022, answer due 10/24/2022. (Smith, Larry) |
Filing 5 CASE MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS. (EPar) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Patrick G. Gagniuk on behalf of Lakita Snead. (Gagniuk, Patrick) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for *Resident Verify, LLC* (TTho) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Larry P. Smith on behalf of Lakita Snead. (Smith, Larry) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Lakita Snead against Resident Verify, LLC with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9066370 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Wayne - County Where Action Arose: Wayne - County of 1st Defendant: Out of State. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Marco, David) |
A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (TTho) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Snead v. Resident Verify, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Lakita Snead | |
Represented By: | Larry P. Smith |
Represented By: | David M. Marco |
Represented By: | Patrick G. Gagniuk |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Resident Verify, LLC | |
Represented By: | Christi A. Lawson |
Represented By: | John J. Atallah |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.