Kelmendi v. Dionovic et al
| Tom Dionovic and John Kelmendi |
| Carol Septer, Guaresimo, JOHN DOE and Shelby Township |
| 2:2022cv12393 |
| October 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Kimberly G Altman |
| Paul D Borman |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. All Defendants. (Badalamenti, Raechel)
|
|
Filing 6
[STRICKEN]WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. All Defendants. (Badalamenti, Raechel) Modified on 11/3/2022 (SKra).
|
|
NOTICE of Error directed to: Raechel M. Badalamenti re #6 Waiver of Service Executed (60 Day). Document is not flattened and contains fillable fields. Document was stricken and must be refiled correctly. [No Image Associated with this docket entry] (SKra)
|
|
Filing 5
ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Raechel M. Badalamenti appearing on behalf of All Defendants (Badalamenti, Raechel)
|
|
Filing 4
Notice Regarding Parties' Responsibility to Notify Court of Address Changes (KCas)
|
|
Filing 2
SUMMONS Issued for *Guaresimo, Carol Septer, Shelby Township* (Attachments: #1 Document Continuation, #2 Document Continuation) (SSch)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by Tom Dionovic, John Kelmendi against JOHN DOE, Guaresimo, Carol Septer Receipt No: 150002106 - Fee: $ 402. (SSch)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
