Saleh v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
| David Saleh |
| Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Equifax Information Services, LLC, Trans Union LLC and General Motors Financial Company, Inc. |
| 2:2022cv12432 |
| October 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Jonathan JC Grey |
| Matthew F Leitman |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 NOTICE by David Saleh of settlement as to Defendant Equifax Information Services, LLC (Chami, David) |
Filing 14
ORDER TO ATTEND VIDEO SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMISSION OF DISCOVERY PLAN: Scheduling Conference set for 1/10/2023 at 2:30 PM before District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. **PLEASE SEE ORDER FOR IMPORTANT DEADLINE AND ZOOM LINK** (HRya)
|
| Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (Barr, Callie) |
| Filing 12 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Thomas M. Schehr appearing on behalf of General Motors Financial Company, Inc. (Schehr, Thomas) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by General Motors Financial Company, Inc.. (Katz, Erin) |
| Filing 10 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by General Motors Financial Company, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent General Motors Company for General Motors Financial Company, Inc.. (Katz, Erin) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE by David Saleh of settlement as to Defendant Trans Union LLC (Chami, David) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. General Motors Financial Company, Inc. served on 10/27/2022, answer due 11/17/2022. (Chami, David) |
|
Filing 7
STIPULATION AND ORDER Extending Time for Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. to Answer or Otherwise Plead to #1 Complaint. Response due by 11/28/2022. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HRya)
|
|
Filing 6
STIPULATED ORDER for Extension of Time for Defendant Equifax Information Services LLC to File Answer to #1 Complaint. Response due by 11/25/2022. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HRya)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Jordan S. Bolton on behalf of Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Bolton, Jordan) |
| Filing 4 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (Barr, Callie) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Callie Marie Barr on behalf of Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. (Barr, Callie) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for * All Defendants * (KBro) |
| A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (KBro) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by David Saleh against Equifax Information Services, LLC, Experian Information Solutions, Inc., General Motors Financial Company, Inc., Trans Union LLC with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9086983 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Wayne - County Where Action Arose: Wayne - County of 1st Defendant: Out of State. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Chami, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
