Nine HKG Limited v. Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff: Nine HKG Limited
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Case Number: 2:2022cv12486
Filed: October 17, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Bernard A Friedman
Referring Judge: Curtis Ivy
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER GRANTING #18 JOINT MOTION TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER: (Fact Discovery due by 1/31/2024, Dispositive Motion Cut-off set for 6/28/2024, Final Pretrial Conference set for 10/1/2024 01:30 PM, Jury Trial set for 10/15/2024 09:00 AM before District Judge Bernard A. Friedman). Signed by District Judge Bernard A. Friedman. (Refer to image for additional dates) (JCur)
October 5, 2023 Filing 18 Joint MOTION to Enter an Amended Scheduling Order re #15 Scheduling Order, by Ford Motor Company. (Cusumano, Francesca)
August 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 17 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by District Judge Bernard A. Friedman. (JCur)
July 24, 2023 Filing 16 NOTICE by Nine HKG Limited re #15 Scheduling Order, NOTICE OF JOINTLY SELECTED MEDIATOR (Conway, Michael)
June 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 15 SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 1/16/2024; Dispositive Motion Cut-off set for 6/28/2024; Final Pretrial Conference set for 10/1/2024 01:30 PM; Jury Trial set for 10/15/2024 09:00 AM before District Judge Bernard A. Friedman. Signed by District Judge Bernard A. Friedman. (Refer to image for additional dates) (JCur)
April 3, 2023 Filing 14 DISCOVERY plan jointly filed pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(f) (Burkholder, Evan)
March 24, 2023 Filing 13 NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMISSION OF JOINT DISCOVERY PLAN (JCur)
March 23, 2023 Filing 12 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Nine HKG Limited (Burkholder, Evan)
January 10, 2023 Filing 11 REPLY to #7 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim by Nine HKG Limited. (Conway, Michael)
January 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 STIPULATED ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO #7 COUNTERCLAIM: (Response due by 1/18/2023). Signed by District Judge Bernard A. Friedman. (JCur)
December 15, 2022 Filing 9 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Francesca Marie Cusumano appearing on behalf of Ford Motor Company (Cusumano, Francesca)
December 14, 2022 Filing 8 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Ford Motor Company (Lorelli, Marc)
December 14, 2022 Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses with Jury Demand , COUNTERCLAIM filed by Ford Motor Company against Nine HKG Limited by Ford Motor Company. (Lorelli, Marc)
November 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Stipulated ORDER Extending Time to Answer Complaint and to Seal Exhibits attached to the Complaint. Signed by District Judge Bernard A. Friedman. (SSch)
November 10, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher C. Smith on behalf of Ford Motor Company. (Smith, Christopher)
November 10, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Marc Lorelli on behalf of Ford Motor Company. (Lorelli, Marc)
November 4, 2022 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Ford Motor Company served on 10/24/2022, answer due 11/14/2022. (Burkholder, Evan)
October 18, 2022 Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Ford Motor Company* (SKra)
October 18, 2022 A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (SKra)
October 17, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Nine HKG Limited against Ford Motor Company with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9093448 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Out of Country - County Where Action Arose: Wayne - County of 1st Defendant: Wayne. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8) (Burkholder, Evan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nine HKG Limited v. Ford Motor Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nine HKG Limited
Represented By: Evan A. Burkholder
Represented By: Michael Conway
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Represented By: Christopher C. Smith
Represented By: Marc Lorelli
Represented By: Francesca Marie Cusumano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?