IHealth Pharmacy LLC v Liberty Surplus Insurance Corporation
Plaintiff: IHealth Pharmacy LLC d/b/a CET Pharmacy Service and IHealth Pharmacy LLC Doing business as CET Pharmacy Service
Defendant: Liberty Surplus Insurance Corporation
Case Number: 2:2022cv12587
Filed: October 27, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Terrence G Berg
Referring Judge: Mark A Goldsmith
2 Judge: Anthony P Patti
3 Judge: Elizabeth A Stafford
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 16, 2022 Filing 6 DISCOVERY plan jointly filed pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(f) (Zapczynski, Jesse)
November 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER Requiring Parties to Submit a Joint Discovery Plan. (Response due by 12/16/2022) Signed by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (AChu)
November 15, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE from District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith and Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti to District Judge Terrence G. Berg and Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford. (SSch)
November 3, 2022 Filing 3 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Ibrahim Y. Hammoud appearing on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Hammoud, Ibrahim)
November 3, 2022 Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses with Jury Demand by Liberty Surplus Insurance Corporation. (Zapczynski, Jesse)
October 28, 2022 A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DAll)
October 27, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Liberty Surplus Insurance Corporation from Washtenaw County Circuit Court, case number 22-001227-NF. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9107912 - Fee: $ 402 [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1-Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2-Plaintiff's Art of Org, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 3-NPI Provider Information, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 4-UPS Tracking) (Zapczynski, Jesse)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: IHealth Pharmacy LLC v Liberty Surplus Insurance Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: IHealth Pharmacy LLC d/b/a CET Pharmacy Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: IHealth Pharmacy LLC Doing business as CET Pharmacy Service
Represented By: Ibrahim Y. Hammoud
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Liberty Surplus Insurance Corporation
Represented By: Jesse A. Zapczynski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?