Domino's Pizza Franchising, LLC v. h&m pizza, LLC et al
Domino's Pizza Franchising, LLC |
h&m pizza, LLC and Mario Ballinas |
2:2022cv12681 |
November 7, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Curtis Ivy |
Matthew F Leitman |
Contract: Franchise |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 Certificate of Service re #18 Notice of Appeal. (DPer) |
Filing 18 NOTICE OF APPEAL by Mario Ballinas re #14 Order remanding case. Fee Status: No Fee Paid. (DPer) |
Filing 17 COPY of #9 Order mailed to h&m pizza, LLC and returned as undeliverable (DPer) |
Filing 16 COPY of #9 Order mailed to Mario Ballinas and returned as undeliverable (DPer) |
Filing 15 NOTICE remanding case to WASHTENAW COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT. (NAhm) |
Filing 14 ORDER (1) REMANDING ACTION FOR LACK OF SUBJECT-MATTER JURISDICTION, (2) VACATING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (ECF No. 6), (3) TERMINATING PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REMAND (ECF No. 7) AS MOOT, AND (4) TERMINATING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF No. 4) AS MOOT. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (NAhm) |
TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #14 Order Remanding Case, on Mario Ballinas and h&m pizza, LLC c/o Mario Ballinas at 5501 Ralston St., Apt. 101, Ventura, CA 93003-6068. (HRya) |
Filing 13 RESPONSE to #7 MOTION to Remand to State Court and Certificate of Service filed by Mario Ballinas. (JOwe) |
Filing 12 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Mario Ballinas. [Submitted through Pro Se Portal 12/19/22] (SSch) |
Filing 11 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to h&m pizza, LLC re #6 Order to Show Cause (NAhm) |
Filing 10 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Mario Ballinas re #6 Order to Show Cause (NAhm) |
Filing 9 ORDER Granting Plaintiff's #8 Unopposed Motion to Extend Deadline for Plaintiff Domino's to Respond to Defendant Ballinas' #4 MOTION to Dismiss or Transfer. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HRya) |
TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #9 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply on Mario Ballinas, and h&m pizza, LLC, c/o Mario Ballinas at 5501 Ralston St., Apt. 101, Ventura, CA 93003-6068. (HRya) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #4 MOTION to Dismiss and Certificate of Service by Domino's Pizza Franchising, LLC. (Hood, Edward) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Remand to State Court and Certificate of Service by Domino's Pizza Franchising, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A - Affidavits of Service, #3 Exhibit B - California Secretary of State Website Business Search, #4 Exhibit C - August 21, 2018 Articles of Organization of h&m pizza, LLC, #5 Exhibit D - October 11, 2018 Statement of Information (SOS Control ID:LBA32103886) for h&m) (Hood, Edward) |
Filing 6 ORDER to Show Cause or File an Amended Notice of Removal. Show Cause Response due by 12/19/2022. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HRya) |
TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #6 Order to Show Cause on Mario Ballinas and H&M Pizza, LLC at 5501 Ralston St., Apt. 101, Ventura, CA 93003-6068. (HRya) |
Filing 5 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by h&m pizza, LLC (DPer) |
Filing 4 MOTION to dismiss and/or to transfer venue by Mario Ballinas. (DPer) |
Filing 2 Notice of Filing Fee Not Paid. Correction due by 11/14/2022 (TTho) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Mario Ballinas from 22nd Judicial Circuit Court, case number 22-001130-CB. (TTho) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.