Daniels v. Touchpoint Support Services, Inc.
| Mercedez Daniels |
| Touchpoint Support Services, Inc. |
| 2:2022cv12745 |
| November 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Sean F Cox |
| Curtis Ivy |
| Thomas L Ludington |
| Patricia T Morris |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO APPEAR IN PERSON: Scheduling Conference set for 3/7/2023 at 02:30PM before District Judge Sean F. Cox (Zaidel, B) |
| Filing 8 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Touchpoint Support Services, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Compass Group PLC, Other Affiliate Compass Group USA, Inc. for Touchpoint Support Services, Inc.. (Sanborn, Marcus) |
Filing 7
Order Vacating #5 Order to Show Cause for Failure to Prosecute. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC)
|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by Touchpoint Support Services, Inc.. (Sanborn, Marcus) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER for Plaintiff to Show Cause Why This Case Should Not be Dismissed for Failure to Prosecute. Show Cause Response due by 1/12/2023. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC)
|
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Touchpoint Support Services, Inc. served on 11/21/2022, answer due 12/12/2022. (Cochran, Terry) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Corrected Judicial Assignment due to Clerical Error: Reassigned from * District Judge Thomas L. Ludington* and *Magistrate Judge Patricia T. Morris* in Bay City to District Judge Sean F. Cox and Magistrate Judge Curtis Ivy, Jr in Detroit (SSch) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Touchpoint Support Services, Inc.* (DAll) |
| A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DAll) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Mercedez Daniels against Touchpoint Support Services, Inc. with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9127202 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Oakland - County Where Action Arose: Saginaw - County of 1st Defendant: Fulton. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Cochran, Terry) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Daniels v. Touchpoint Support Services, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mercedez Daniels | |
| Represented By: | Terry Cochran |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Touchpoint Support Services, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Marcus R. Sanborn |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
