Kerwin v. Starbucks Corporation
| Regional Director Elizabeth K. Kerwin |
| Starbucks Corporation |
| Workers United |
| 2:2022cv12761 |
| November 15, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Mark A Goldsmith |
| Elizabeth A Stafford |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 22
REPLY Brief Petition for Preliminary Injunction under SEction 10(j) of the National Labor Relations Act by Elizabeth K. Kerwin. (Fedewa, Patricia)
|
|
TEXT-ONLY ORDER: Respondent Starbucks motion for leave to file excess pages is granted (Dkt. #20 ). Starbucks may file a brief in response to Petitioners petition of up to 40 pages. SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (KSan)
|
|
Filing 21
ANSWER to Complaint [Continued Containing] Respondent Starbucks Corporation's Response To Petition for Preliminary Injunction Under Section 10(j) of National Labor Relations Act (ECF #1) by Starbucks Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit 1 - Portions of the General Counsels Exhibits in the Hearing before the Administrative Law Judge in Board Case 07-CA-292971, #3 Exhibit 2 - Portions of the Respondents Exhibits in the Hearing before the Administrative Law Judge in Board Case 07-CA-292971, #4 Exhibit 3 - The General Counsels Cross-Exceptions to the Decision of the Administrative Law Judge in Board Case 07-CA-292971, filed on December 2, 2022, #5 Exhibit 4 - The General Counsels Brief in support of its Cross-Exceptions to the Decision of the Administrative Law Judge in Board Case 07-CA-292971, filed on December 2, 2022, #6 Exhibit 5 - Respondent Starbucks Exceptions to the Decision of the Administrative Law Judge in Board Case 07-CA-292971, filed on November 18, 2022, #7 Exhibit 6 - NLRB 10(j) Injunction activity and dates list from the NLRBs website, #8 Exhibit 7 - NLRB Tally of Ballots records from elections at Michigan Starbucks stores involving the Workers United Union and Starbucks, #9 Exhibit 8 - Publicly available news articles and media, #10 Exhibit 9 - Unreported cases, #11 Exhibit 10 - Affidavit of Erik Hult) (Pioch, Neil)
|
|
Filing 20
MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages by Starbucks Corporation. (Pioch, Neil)
|
|
Filing 19
STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Starbucks Corporation (Pioch, Neil)
|
|
Filing 18
ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by Starbucks Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A - Transcript Vol. I of IV, Pages 1-191, #3 Exhibit B - Transcript Vol. II of IV, Pages 192-431, #4 Exhibit C - Transcript Vol. III of IV, Pages 432-575, #5 Exhibit D - Transcript Vol. IV of IV, Pages 576-743) (Pioch, Neil)
|
|
Filing 17
ORDER Granting Motion for Leave to Appear as Amicus Curiae (Dkt. #9 ). Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (KSan)
|
|
Filing 16
REPLY to Response re #9 INITIATING MOTION Leave to Appear as Amicus Curiae by Workers United. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9156773 - Fee: 49 dollars Workers United's Reply in Support of Its Motion for Leave to Appear as Amicus Curiae filed by Workers United. (Lichtman, David)
|
|
Filing 15
RESPONSE to #9 INITIATING MOTION Leave to Appear as Amicus Curiae by Workers United. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9156773 - Fee: 49 dollars filed by Starbucks Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A - ECF #20, Motion of Workers United To Intervene or, In the Alternative, To Participate as Amicus Curiae, McKinney v. Starbucks Corporation, No. 2:22-cv-2292 (W.D. Tenn. May 13, 2022), #3 Exhibit B - ECF # 45, Order Denying In Part and Granting In Part Motion of Workers United To Intervene or, in the Alternative, To Participate as Amicus Curiae, McKinney v. Starbucks Corporation, No. 2:22-cv-2292 (W.D. Tenn. May 19, 2022)) (Pioch, Neil)
|
|
Filing 14
NOTICE of Appearance by Angelique Paul Newcomb on behalf of Starbucks Corporation. (Newcomb, Angelique)
|
|
Filing 13
NOTICE of Appearance by Neil B. Pioch on behalf of Starbucks Corporation. (Pioch, Neil)
|
|
Filing 12
ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Elizabeth Rowe appearing on behalf of Workers United (Rowe, Elizabeth)
|
|
Filing 11
ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: David P. Lichtman appearing on behalf of Workers United (Lichtman, David)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE of Appearance by Benjamin L. King on behalf of Workers United. (King, Benjamin)
|
|
Filing 9
INITIATING MOTION Leave to Appear as Amicus Curiae by Workers United. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9156773 - Fee: 49 dollars (Canzano, John) Modified on 12/8/2022 (SKra).[WRONG EVENT USED-MOTION OF WORKERS UNITED FOR LEAVE TO APPEAR AS AMICUS CURIAE]
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER Granting Respondent's Motion to Extend Answer Deadline and Hearing Date (Dkt. #7 ) ( Hearing RESET for 2/1/2023 04:00 PM before District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith). Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (KSan)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Starbucks Corporation. (Hult, Erik)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE of Appearance by Erik C. Hult on behalf of Starbucks Corporation. (Hult, Erik)
|
|
Filing 5
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Elizabeth K. Kerwin Petition/Order Show Cause on Workers United (Fedewa, Patricia)
|
|
Filing 4
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Elizabeth K. Kerwin Order to Show Cause on Respondent (Fedewa, Patricia)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Hearing set for 1/5/2023 08:30 AM before District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (KSan)
|
|
Filing 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #1 Initiating Petition,,, by Elizabeth K. Kerwin For Preliminary Injunction Under Section 10(j) of the National Labor Relations Act, As Amended (Fedewa, Patricia)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION For Preliminary Injunction Under Section 10(j) of the National Labor Relations Act, As Amended filed by Elizabeth K. Kerwin against Starbucks Corporation. No summons requested. No Fee Required - US Government. County of 1st Plaintiff: Wayne - County Where Action Arose: Washtenaw - County of 1st Defendant: Washtenaw. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit Charge in Case 07-CA-293916, #3 Exhibit NLRB Consolidated Complaint, #4 Exhibit Administrative Law Judge's Decision, #5 Exhibit Patricia Fedewa Affidavit, #6 Exhibit Matthew Kain Affidavit) (Fedewa, Patricia)
|
|
A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DAll)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
