Arrington v. Mazen et al
Shrondrey Arrington |
Mazen, Peters, Blanden and B. Smith |
2:2022cv12766 |
November 15, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Matthew F Leitman |
Elizabeth A Stafford |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 JUDGMENT. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HRya) |
Filing 6 ORDER Summarily Dismissing Civil Rights #1 Complaint Without Prejudice. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HRya) |
TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #7 Judgment, #6 Order Dismissing Case on Shrondrey Arrington Pris. No. 189374 at Genesee County Jail, 1002 S. Saginaw St., Flint, MI 48502. (HRya) |
Filing 5 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Shondrey Arrington re #4 Regarding Parties Responsibility to Notify Court of Address Changes (NAhm) |
Filing 4 Notice Regarding Parties' Responsibility to Notify Court of Address Changes (KCas) |
Filing 3 ORDER Requiring signed certification of inmate's trust account from authorized jail official and a current computerized trust fund statement of account. Signed by Magistrate Judge David R. Grand. (SKra) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION to Proceed without prepaying fees or costs by Shrondrey Arrington. (SKra) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Shrondrey Arrington against Blanden, Mazen, Peters, B. Smith (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (SKra) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.