Ruff v. United States of America et al
| Bobbie Deanna Ruff |
| United States of America, Kevin Thyas, Lawrence Basquin and Danny Cain |
| 2:2022cv12805 |
| November 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Bernard A Friedman |
| Jonathan JC Grey |
| Victoria A Roberts |
| Elizabeth A Stafford |
| P.I.: Other |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
OPINION AND ORDER granting plaintiff's #2 application to proceed wihtout prepaying fees or costs, dismissing the #1 complaint, and denying as moot plaintiff's #3 motion to appoint counseL. Signed by District Judge Bernard A. Friedman. (JCur)
|
|
TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #7 Opinion & Order, on Bobbie Deanna Ruff at 28 E. Pleasant St., River Rouge, MI 48218. (JCur)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE from District Judge Victoria A. Roberts and Magistrate Judge Jonathan J.C. Grey to District Judge Bernard A. Friedman and Magistrate Judge Elizabeth A. Stafford. (SSch)
|
|
Filing 5
Notice Regarding Parties' Responsibility to Notify Court of Address Changes (KCas)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Bobbie Deanna Ruff. (TTho)
|
|
Filing 2
APPLICATION to Proceed without prepaying fees or costs by Bobbie Deanna Ruff. (TTho)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by Bobbie Deanna Ruff against All Defendants (Attachments: #1 Document Continuation, #2 Document Continuation) (TTho)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
