Blanks v. Social Security, Commissioner of
| Tasha Blanks |
| Commissioner of Social Security and Social Security, Commissioner of |
| 2:2022cv12948 |
| December 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Anthony P Patti |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
TEXT-ONLY ORDER Granting #3 Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint. Answer due 3/3/2023. Entered by Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti. (LHos)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint,, by Social Security, Commissioner of. (Ridgell-Boltz, Laura) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Laura Ridgell-Boltz on behalf of Social Security, Commissioner of. (Ridgell-Boltz, Laura) |
| TEXT-ONLY NOTICE of New Case Filing to Social Security Administration's Office of the General Counsel and the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Michigan. (DAll) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Tasha Blanks against Commissioner of Social Security. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9152471 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Genesee - County Where Action Arose: Genesee - County of 1st Defendant: USA. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (MacDonald, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
