Jackson v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
| Carlos Jackson |
| United Parcel Service, Inc. |
| 2:2022cv12966 |
| December 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Kimberly G Altman |
| Sean F Cox |
| Gershwin A Drain |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Job Discrimination (Race) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 DISCOVERY plan jointly filed pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(f) (Rosenberg, Ryan) |
| Filing 10 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by United Parcel Service, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent United Parcel Service, Inc. (Delaware Corporation) for United Parcel Service, Inc.. (Mihelick, John) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE TO APPEAR IN PERSON: Scheduling Conference set for 3/14/2023 at 01:00PM before District Judge Sean F. Cox (Zaidel, B) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by United Parcel Service, Inc.. (Mihelick, John) |
Filing 7
STIPULATION AND ORDER for Deadline to File Answer re #1 Complaint. (Responsive Pleading due by 1/24/2023) Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by John T. Mihelick on behalf of United Parcel Service, Inc.. (Mihelick, John) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. United Parcel Service, Inc. served on 12/13/2022, answer due 1/3/2023. (Rosenberg, Ryan) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER of RECUSAL and REASSIGNING CASE from District Judge Gershwin A. Drain to District Judge Sean F. Cox. (SSch)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Barry S. Fagan on behalf of Carlos Jackson. (Fagan, Barry) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *United Parcel Service, Inc.* (DAll) |
| A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DAll) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND filed by Carlos Jackson against United Parcel Service, Inc. with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9155721 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Wayne - County Where Action Arose: Wayne - County of 1st Defendant: Wayne. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Rosenberg, Ryan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jackson v. United Parcel Service, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Carlos Jackson | |
| Represented By: | Ryan Olivia Rosenberg |
| Represented By: | Barry S. Fagan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United Parcel Service, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | John T. Mihelick |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
