Richards v. Community Choice Credit Union
| Joi Richards |
| COMMUNITY CHOICE CREDIT UNION, and Community Choice Credit Union |
| 2:2022cv13014 |
| December 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Bernard A Friedman |
| Anthony P Patti |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 451 Employment Discrimination |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Community Choice Credit Union (Milton, Lisa) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses with Jury Demand by Community Choice Credit Union. (Milton, Lisa) |
| A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (TTho) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by COMMUNITY CHOICE CREDIT UNION, from Oakland County Circuit Court, case number 2022-197235-CD. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9162152 - Fee: $ 402 [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 - Amended Complaint) (Milton, Lisa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
