Lentz
| George M. Lentz |
| 2:2022mc50449 |
| March 14, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Sean F Cox |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to George M. Lentz re #1 Misc. Case - Notice of Attorney Discipline (NAhm) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Reciprocal Suspension due to Nonpayment of Fees to the Michigan State Bar for George M. Lentz. (Attachments: #1 2022 SBM Notice of Suspension for Non-Payment of Fees) (JOwe) |
| TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #1 Misc. Case - Notice of Attorney Discipline on George M. Lentz at General Motors, Delco Remy Division, 8371 Glenside Ct., Indianapolis, IN 46256 (JOwe) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lentz | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| In re: George M. Lentz | |
| Represented By: | George M. Lentz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
