Johnson v. Elum et al
Darren Johnson |
Elum, Woodward, Poupard, T. Kisor, Nagy and Russell |
2:2023cv10093 |
January 12, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
David R. Grand |
Denise Page Hood |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER Denying Plaintiff's Motion to Alter or Amend a Judgment #7 . Signed by District Judge Denise Page Hood. (LSau) |
TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #8 Order on Motion to Amend/Correct on Darren Johnson Pris. No. 753595 at 3500 N. Elm Road, Jackson, MI 49201. (LSau) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Alter or Amend #6 Judgment by Darren Johnson. (NAhm) |
Filing 6 JUDGMENT. Signed by District Judge Denise Page Hood. (LSau) |
Filing 5 OPINION and ORDER Denying Plaintiff Permission to Proceed In Forma Pauperis #2 , Denying his Motion to File a Civil Rights Complaint #3 and Dismissing the Case. Signed by District Judge Denise Page Hood. (LSau) |
TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #6 Judgment, #5 Memorandum Opinion & Order on Darren Johnson Pris. No. 753595 at 3500 N. Elm Road, Jackson, MI 49201. (LSau) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Mediation Program (DAll) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to File by Darren Johnson. (DAll) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION to Proceed without prepaying fees or costs by Darren Johnson. (DAll) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Darren Johnson against Elum, T. Kisor, Nagy, Poupard, Russell, Woodward (DAll) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.