Comerica Bank v. Cash
| Comerica Bank |
| Eric W. Cash |
| 2:2023cv10191 |
| January 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Paul D Borman |
| Elizabeth A Stafford |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Nashara A. Latoya Peart on behalf of Comerica Bank. (Peart, Nashara) |
Filing 11
ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO MEET AND TO FILE JOINT FED.R.CIV.P. 26 PLAN Discovery plan due by 3/31/2023 Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DTof)
|
| Filing 10 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by Eric W. Cash. (Laue, Nicholas) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER to Extend Time to File Responsive Pleading re #1 Complaint filed by Comerica Bank. Response due by 3/7/2023 Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DTof)
|
| Filing 8 STIPULATION For Extension of Time to File Defendant's Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint by Eric W. Cash (Laue, Nicholas) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER to Strike 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer - Stipulated Proposed Order filed by Eric W. Cash. Signed by District Judge Paul D. Borman. (DTof)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Nicholas Laue on behalf of Eric W. Cash. (Laue, Nicholas) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. Eric W. Cash served on 1/31/2023, answer due 2/21/2023. (Roach, Steven) |
| Filing 3 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Comerica Bank identifying Corporate Parent Comerica, Inc. for Comerica Bank. (Roach, Steven) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Eric W. Cash* (DPer) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Comerica Bank, a Texas Banking Association against Eric W. Cash. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9208852 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Texas - County Where Action Arose: Wayne - County of 1st Defendant: Georgia. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit 1 - Executed Guaranty Amended and Restated, #3 Exhibit 2 - Credit Agreement dated December 28, 2021, #4 Exhibit 3 - Installment Note dated December 28, 2021, in the amount of $7,325,000.00, #5 Exhibit 4 - Installment Note dated December 28, 2021, in the amount of $2,280,000.00, #6 Exhibit 5 - Letter - Executed Forbearance Agreement dated April 8, 2022) (Roach, Steven) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Comerica Bank v. Cash | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Comerica Bank | |
| Represented By: | Steven A. Roach |
| Represented By: | Nashara A. Latoya Peart |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Eric W. Cash | |
| Represented By: | Nicholas Laue |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
