Madrigal Lane v. US Citizenship and Immigration Service, Director of
Petitioner: Juliana Madrigal Lane and James Lane, III
Respondent: Ur Mendoza Jaddou and US Citizenship and Immigration Service, Director of
Case Number: 4:2023cv10311
Filed: February 6, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Kimberly G Altman
Referring Judge: Shalina D Kumar
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 9, 2023 Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Juliana Madrigal Lane, James Lane, III against US Citizenship and Immigration Service, Director of. NEW PARTIES ADDED. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G) (Al-Akhras, Jana)
March 8, 2023 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. U.S. Attorney on behalf of US Citizenship and Immigration Service, Director of served on 2/21/2023, answer due 4/24/2023. (Al-Akhras, Jana)
February 8, 2023 Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for the United States Attorney and the Office of the Attorney General. (TTho)
February 8, 2023 Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *US Citizenship and Immigration Service, Director of* (TTho)
February 8, 2023 A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (TTho)
February 6, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS filed by Juliana Madrigal Lane against Ur Mendoza Jaddou. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9226740 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Genesee - County Where Action Arose: Genesee - County of 1st Defendant: USA. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Al-Akhras, Jana)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Madrigal Lane v. US Citizenship and Immigration Service, Director of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Juliana Madrigal Lane
Represented By: Jana Al-Akhras
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: James Lane, III
Represented By: Jana Al-Akhras
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Ur Mendoza Jaddou
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: US Citizenship and Immigration Service, Director of
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?