Surfacide, LLC v. UVC Cleaning Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff: Surfacide, LLC
Defendant: UVC Cleaning Systems, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2023cv10335
Filed: February 8, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Thomas L Ludington
Referring Judge: Patricia T Morris
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 10, 2023 Filing 7 SUMMONS Issued for *UVC Cleaning Systems, Inc.* (TTho)
February 10, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Brad A. Danek on behalf of Surfacide, LLC. (Danek, Brad)
February 10, 2023 A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (TTho)
February 9, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael T. Price on behalf of Surfacide, LLC. (Price, Michael)
February 8, 2023 Filing 4 STATEMENT of Rule 7.1 by Surfacide, LLC (Cotter, John)
February 8, 2023 Filing 3 Patent Report Sent To Washington (Cotter, John)
February 8, 2023 Filing 2 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Surfacide, LLC (Cotter, John)
February 8, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Surfacide, LLC against UVC Cleaning Systems, Inc. with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9230161 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Out of State - County Where Action Arose: Tuscola - County of 1st Defendant: Tuscola. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit 1 - US Patent No 8,895,939, #3 Exhibit 2 - US Patent No 9,272,059, #4 Exhibit 3 - US Patent No 9,592,312, #5 Exhibit 4 - US Patent No 9,782,505, #6 Exhibit 5 - US Patent No 10,561,981, #7 Exhibit 6 - UVC Cleaning Systems, Inc. Product Catalog, #8 Exhibit 7 - Webpage Print Out, #9 Exhibit 8 - UVC Cleaning Systems, Inc. Overview, LinkedIn, #10 Exhibit 9 - Webpage Print Out, #11 Exhibit 10 - Webpage Print Out, #12 Exhibit 11 - Webpage Print Out, #13 Exhibit 12 - M20 & M15 Specification Sheet, #14 Exhibit 13 - Webpage Print Out, #15 Exhibit 14 - Claim Chart for Claim 1 of US Patent No 8,895,939, #16 Exhibit 15 - Claim Chart for Claim 1 of US Patent No 9,272,059, #17 Exhibit 16 - Claim Chart for Claim 20 of US Patent No 9,592,312, #18 Exhibit 17 - Claim Chart for Claim 1 of US Patent No 9,782,505, #19 Exhibit 18 - Claim Chart for Claim 14 of US Patent No 10,561,981) (Cotter, John)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Surfacide, LLC v. UVC Cleaning Systems, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Surfacide, LLC
Represented By: John A. Cotter
Represented By: Michael T. Price
Represented By: Brad A. Danek
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UVC Cleaning Systems, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?