Williams v. Old Navy, LLC
| Chereka Williams |
| Old Navy, LLC |
| 2:2023cv10399 |
| February 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Mark A Goldsmith |
| Curtis Ivy |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Removal |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Kevin Charles Majewski on behalf of Old Navy, LLC. (Majewski, Kevin) |
| Minute Entry for telephonic proceedings before District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith: Telephonic Scheduling Conference held on 3/27/2023 (Court Reporter: None Present, Not on the Record) (KSan) |
| Filing 7 DISCOVERY plan jointly filed pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(f) (Wright, Nicole) |
| Filing 6 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Old Navy, LLC identifying Corporate Parent The Gap, Inc. for Old Navy, LLC. (Wright, Nicole) |
Filing 5
ORDER Regarding Telephonic Scheduling Conference ( TELEPHONIC Scheduling Conference set for 3/27/2023 04:00 PM before District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith). Plaintiffs counsel shall initiate the call, and then include the Court by calling (313) 234-5240 when all parties are on the line. Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (KSan)
|
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses with Jury Demand by Old Navy, LLC. (Wright, Nicole) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER Regarding Protocols on Filings and Communication with the Court. Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (KSan)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER Regarding Removal. Signed by District Judge Mark A. Goldsmith. (KSan)
|
| A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (KBro) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Old Navy, LLC from Kalamazoo County Circuit Court, case number 2022-0464-NO. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9238023 - Fee: $ 402 [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A - Amended Complaint, #3 Exhibit B - Service of Process Transmittal, #4 Exhibit C - Letter to Plaintiff's Attorney with proposed Stipulated Order Capping Damages) (Wright, Nicole) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Williams v. Old Navy, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Chereka Williams | |
| Represented By: | Brian E. Muawad |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Old Navy, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Nicole M. Wright |
| Represented By: | Kevin Charles Majewski |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
