Fischer v. Schiebner
| Gary Thomas Fischer |
| James Schiebner |
| 2:2023cv10518 |
| March 3, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Jonathan JC Grey |
| Stephen J Murphy |
| Anthony P Patti |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrea M. Christensen-Brown on behalf of James Schiebner. (Christensen-Brown, Andrea) |
Filing 7
ORDER Requiring Response to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Attached Petition has been electronically served on the Michigan Attorney General and the Michigan Department of Corrections. Response due by 9/26/2023 Signed by Magistrate Judge David R. Grand. (Attachments: #1 Petition) (NAhm)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #2 Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge David R. Grand. (NAhm)
|
| Text-Only Order of reassignment from Magistrate Judge Jonathan J.C. Grey - MJ to Magistrate Judge Anthony P. Patti pursuant to Local Rule 83.11. (JOwe) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Amanda N. Bashi on behalf of Gary Thomas Fischer. (Bashi, Amanda) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Benton C. Martin on behalf of Gary Thomas Fischer. (Martin, Benton) |
| Filing 3 SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Gary Thomas Fischer. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit 1, ROA, #3 Exhibit 2, Trial Transcript 3/4/19, #4 Exhibit 3, Trial Transcript 3/5/19, #5 Exhibit 4, Sentencing Transcript 4/4/19, #6 Exhibit 5, Appellant Brief, #7 Exhibit 6, 1st Motion to Remand, #8 Exhibit 7, 1st Answer Motion to Remand, #9 Exhibit 8, Order 3/4/20, #10 Exhibit 9, Appellee Brief, #11 Exhibit 10, 2d Motion to Remand, #12 Exhibit 11, Appendix, 2d Motion to Remand, #13 Exhibit 12, 2d Answer Motion to Remand, #14 Exhibit 13, Order 6/9/20, #15 Exhibit 14, 3d Motion to Remand, #16 Exhibit 15, Order 11/18/20, #17 Exhibit 16, MCOA Op. 12/17/20, #18 Exhibit 17, Appl. Leave to Appeal, #19 Exhibit 18, Mich. S. Ct. Order 10/12/21, #20 Exhibit 19, Resentencing Transcript, 2/15/22, #21 Exhibit 20, Order 8/16/22) (Martin, Benton) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION to Proceed without prepaying fees or costs by Gary Thomas Fischer. (Martin, Benton) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Gary Thomas Fischer against Gary Thomas Fischer. IFP Application to Follow. (Martin, Benton) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Fischer v. Schiebner | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Gary Thomas Fischer | |
| Represented By: | Benton C. Martin |
| Represented By: | Amanda N. Bashi |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: James Schiebner | |
| Represented By: | Andrea M. Christensen-Brown |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
