Merchants Mutual Insurance Co. v. Hess
| Merchants Mutual Insurance Co. |
| Daniel Hess Daniel Hess d/b/a Hess's Affordable Wood Floor Service and Daniel Hess Doing business as Hess's Affordable Wood Floor Service |
| 2:2023cv10523 |
| March 3, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Terrence G Berg |
| Curtis Ivy |
| Prop. Damage Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Property Damage |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Daniel Hess* (DPer) |
| A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DPer) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Merchants Mutual Insurance Co. against Daniel Hess with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9258943 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Erie County, NY - County Where Action Arose: Genesee - County of 1st Defendant: Genesee County, MI. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Civil Cover Sheer, #2 Exhibit Summons) (Henry, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
