Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc. et al v. Kaelan Inc. et al
Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc. and LC Trademarks, Inc. |
Kaelan Inc., Kaelan Hakim, Muffaq Hakim and Najla Hakim |
2:2023cv10529 |
March 6, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
David R. Grand |
Stephen J Murphy |
Contract: Franchise |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 Trademark Infringement |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by All Plaintiffs (Saylor, Larry) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Issued for *Kaelan Inc.* (DAll) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Issued for *Najla Hakim* (DAll) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Issued for *Muffaq Hakim* (DAll) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued for *Kaelan Hakim* (DAll) |
Filing 4 Trademark Report Sent To Washington (Saylor, Larry) |
Filing 3 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by LC Trademarks, Inc. (Saylor, Larry) |
Filing 2 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Little Caesar Enterprises, Inc. (Saylor, Larry) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by All Plaintiffs against All Defendants. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9260389 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Wayne - County Where Action Arose: Wayne - County of 1st Defendant: Wayne. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Saylor, Larry) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.