Wang v. US Citizenship and Immigration Service, Director of et al
Xun Wang |
Director Ur M Jaddou, Secretary Alejandro N Mayorkas, Director Michael J Klinger, US Citizenship and Immigration Service, Director of, US Department of Homeland Security and US Citizenship and Immigration Service Detroit Field Office, Director of |
2:2023cv10714 |
March 27, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Terrence G Berg |
Curtis Ivy |
Other Immigration Actions |
08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for the United States Attorney and the Office of the Attorney General. (LGra) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for * All Defendants * (LGra) |
A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (LGra) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Mandamus and Declaratory Judgment filed by Xun Wang against All Defendants. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9290276 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Oakland County, MI - County Where Action Arose: Wayne County, MI - County of 1st Defendant: USA. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Kaplovitz, Ronald) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.