Rodney-Tyree-Hicks-Bey/R.T. & Shantae Hicks Bey Estate v. Goodstein et al
| Rodney-Tyree-Hicks-Bey/R.T. & Shantae Hicks Bey Estate |
| Peter Goodstein, Elizabeth A. Kelly, Brian Pickett and Deb Cherry |
| 2:2023cv10771 |
| April 4, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Terrence G Berg |
| Elizabeth A Stafford |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 JUDGMENT. Signed by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (AChu) |
Filing 7
ORDER GRANTING #2 Application to Proceed in forma pauperis, and Dismissing #1 Complaint. Signed by District Judge Terrence G. Berg. (AChu)
|
| TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #7 Memorandum Opinion & Order, #8 Judgment on Rodney-Tyree-Hicks-Bey/R.T. & Shantae Hicks Bey Estate at 3202 Wolcott St, Flint, MI 48502. (AChu) |
| Filing 6 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: James J. Hunter appearing on behalf of Peter Goodstein (Hunter, James) |
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: David C. Anderson appearing on behalf of Peter Goodstein (Anderson, David) |
| Filing 4 Notice Regarding Parties' Responsibility to Notify Court of Address Changes (JOwe) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION to Proceed without prepaying fees or costs by Rodney-Tyree-Hicks-Bey/R.T. & Shantae Hicks Bey Estate. (NAhm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Rodney-Tyree-Hicks-Bey/R.T. & Shantae Hicks Bey Estate against All Defendants (NAhm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
