Gates v. Schreiber
| Jason Eugene Gates |
| Michele Floyd and Paul Schreiber |
| 2:2023cv10912 |
| April 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Matthew F Leitman |
| Elizabeth A Stafford |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re documents #6 and #7 by Jason Eugene Gates (DPer) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to be released on recognizance or surety bond by Jason Eugene Gates. (DPer) |
| Filing 6 PETITION for appointment of pro-bono counsel by Jason Eugene Gates. (DPer) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrea M. Christensen-Brown on behalf of Paul Schreiber. (Christensen-Brown, Andrea) |
| Filing 4 Notice Regarding Parties' Responsibility to Notify Court of Address Changes (JOwe) |
Filing 3
ORDER Requiring Response to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Attached Petition has been electronically served on the Michigan Attorney General and the Michigan Department of Corrections. Response due by 10/27/2023 Signed by Magistrate Judge David R. Grand. (Attachments: #1 Habeas Petition) (TTho)
|
|
Filing 2
Order Amending Case Caption. Signed by Magistrate Judge David R. Grand. (TTho)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Jason Eugene Gates against Michele Floyd, Receipt No: 150004507 - Fee: $ 5. (Attachments: #1 Order from Court of Appeals) [Originally filed in 22-12310] (SSch) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
