Escoe v. Peterson et al
Kozak Wolfgang Escoe |
James Peterson and Green |
2:2023cv11012 |
May 1, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Jonathan JC Grey |
Curtis Ivy |
Matthew F Leitman |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Text-Only Order of reassignment from District Judge Matthew F. Leitman to District Judge Jonathan J.C. Grey pursuant to Administrative Order 23-AO-022. Except in cases previously referred to a magistrate judge, existing scheduling orders and motion hearing dates are suspended. Status conferences will be scheduled in the near future for general civil cases. Cases referred to a magistrate judge will keep all previously scheduled dates. (SSch) |
Filing 6 Notice Regarding Parties' Responsibility to Notify Court of Address Changes (JOwe) |
Filing 5 APPLICATION to Proceed without prepaying fees or costs by Kozak Wolfgang Escoe. (TTho) |
Filing 4 ORDER to Correct Deficiency for failure to submit filing fee. Correction due by 6/20/2023 Signed by Magistrate Judge David R. Grand. (LGra) |
Filing 3 Notice Regarding Parties' Responsibility to Notify Court of Address Changes (JOwe) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Mediation Program (SKra) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Kozak Wolfgang Escoe against Green, James Peterson (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (SKra) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.