Sebak v. Ann Arbor-CC, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Matthew Sebak
Defendant: Ann Arbor-CC, LLC, TD Bank, National Association and TD Bank N.A .
Case Number: 2:2023cv11224
Filed: May 24, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Kimberly G Altman
Referring Judge: Linda V Parker
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1640 Truth in Lending
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 SECOND STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TD BANK, N.A. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, ( Response due by 7/31/2023). Signed by District Judge Linda V. Parker. (AFla)
June 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S #4 MOTION FOR WAIVER OF LOCAL COUNSEL REQUIREMENTS PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 83.20(f)(1). Signed by District Judge Linda V. Parker. (AFla)
June 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT TD BANK, N.A. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, ( Response due by 7/13/2023). Signed by District Judge Linda V. Parker. (AFla)
June 14, 2023 Filing 4 APPLICATION for Waiver of Local Counsel Requirements Pursuant to LR 83.20(f)(1) by TD Bank N.A.. (Croft, Blaec)
May 24, 2023 Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for *TD Bank, National Association* (DPer)
May 24, 2023 Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Ann Arbor-CC, LLC* (DPer)
May 24, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Matthew Sebak against Ann Arbor-CC, LLC, TD Bank, National Association with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9359916 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Out of State - County Where Action Arose: Washtenaw - County of 1st Defendant: Washtenaw. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Taub, Adam)
May 24, 2023 A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DPer)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sebak v. Ann Arbor-CC, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Matthew Sebak
Represented By: Adam G. Taub
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ann Arbor-CC, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TD Bank, National Association
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TD Bank N.A .
Represented By: Blaec C. Croft
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?