Timco v. Sterling Heights Police Department et al
| Kyle Jordan Timco |
| Sterling Heights Police Department, Sterling Heights Fire Department, Beaumont Hospital, Michigan Municipal Risk Management and Sterling Heights, City of |
| 2:2023cv11239 |
| May 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Kimberly G Altman |
| Nancy G Edmunds |
| Laurie J Michelson |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER Requiring Clarification Regarding Plaintiff's Intent to Voluntarily Dismiss his Claims - Signed by District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (LBar)
|
| TEXT-ONLY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #7 Order on Kyle Jordan Timco at 8808 Tamarack Drive, Utica, MI 48317. (LBar) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE from District Judge Laurie J. Michelson to District Judge Nancy G. Edmunds. (SSch)
|
| Filing 5 Notice Regarding Parties' Responsibility to Notify Court of Address Changes (JOwe) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST for relief/injunction and confidentiality by Kyle Jordan Timco. (TTho) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION to Proceed without prepaying fees or costs by Kyle Jordan Timco. (NO SIGNATURE) (TTho) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Kyle Jordan Timco against All Defendants (PRO SE UPLOAD SUBMISSION) (Attachments: #1 Document Continuation) (TTho) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
