Oliver v. Oakland County Sheriffs Office et al
| Stanley Oliver |
| Oakland County Sheriffs Office and John Dean |
| 2:2023cv11330 |
| June 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Kimberly G Altman |
| Sean F Cox |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of Service/Summons Returned Executed. John Dean served on 7/12/2023, answer due 8/2/2023. (Boehringer, Matthew) |
Filing 6
STIPULATION AND ORDER Extending Time to Respond to #1 Complaint. (Responsive Pleading due by 9/1/2023) Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC)
|
| Filing 5 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Heather Louise Lewis appearing on behalf of All Defendants (Lewis, Heather) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Kyle Heika appearing on behalf of All Defendants (Heika, Kyle) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for *John Dean* (NAhm) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Oakland County Sheriffs Office* (NAhm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Stanley Oliver against All Defendants. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9371973 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Oakland - County Where Action Arose: Oakland - County of 1st Defendant: Oakland. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Boehringer, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
