Wilkins v. Williams et al
| Cedric Wilkins |
| Harry Williams and ACTION ENTERPRISE HOLDINGS, LLC |
| 2:2023cv11332 |
| June 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Curtis Ivy |
| Laurie J Michelson |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
TEXT-ONLY ORDER: On July 28, 2023, the parties filed a #9 Stipulation to allow substitution of defendant. The filing included a proposed order. Counsel is obliged to be aware of and follow the CM/ECF electronic policies and procedures. "Proposed orders must be submitted to the judge to whom the case is assigned... via the link located under the Utilities section of CM/ECF." E.D. Mich. Electronic Filing Policies and Procedures R12(a). If a proposed order is accepted, the Court will then docket it with the Judge's electronic signature. "Proposed" orders should never be e-filed and docketed by a party. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Clerk shall STRIKE the stipulation and proposed order attached (ECF No. #9 ). Issued by District Judge Laurie J. Michelson. (EPar)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE: Scheduling Conference reset for 8/7/2023 at 03:30 PM before District Judge Laurie J. Michelson (EPar) |
| Filing 9 [STRICKEN] STIPULATION to Substitute Defendant by Cedric Wilkins (Rothstein, Michael) Modified on 8/2/2023 (EPar). |
| TEXT-ONLY NOTICE: The telephonic scheduling conference on 7/27/2023 is Cancelled. The Court will work with the parties to reschedule. (EPar) |
| RESET Hearing: **DATE CHANGE** TELEPHONIC Scheduling Conference reset for 7/27/2023 at 02:00 PM before District Judge Laurie J. Michelson. **All call-in information remains the same as the original notice** (EPar) |
| Filing 8 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Action Enterprise Holdings, LLC (Zwicker, Adam) |
| Filing 7 DISCOVERY plan jointly filed pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(f) (Rothstein, Michael) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER TO ATTEND SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND NOTICE OF REQUIREMENTS FOR SUBMISSION OF DISCOVERY PLAN. (TELEPHONIC Scheduling Conference set for 7/21/2023 at 02:00 PM before District Judge Laurie J. Michelson) Signed by District Judge Laurie J. Michelson. (EPar)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER REGARDING MAGISTRATE JUDGE JURISDICTION. Signed by District Judge Laurie J. Michelson. (EPar)
|
| Filing 4 CASE MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS. (EPar) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Non-Party Fault by All Defendants (Zwicker, Adam) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses with Jury Demand by All Defendants. (Zwicker, Adam) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by All Defendants from Oakland County Circuit Court, case number 2023-199964-NI. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9372059 - Fee: $ 402 [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): Oakland County Circuit Court, 2023-199964-NI, Judge Martha D. Anderson] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Notice of Removal to Federal Court) (Zwicker, Adam) |
| A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (LGra) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
