BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. Front 27 Inc. et al
BMO Harris Bank N.A. |
Front 27 Inc. and Martin Zurevski |
2:2023cv11477 |
June 21, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Sean F Cox |
Elizabeth A Stafford |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for *Martin Zurevski* (LGra) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Front 27 Inc.* (LGra) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT VERIFIED COMPLAINT filed by BMO Harris Bank N.A. against All Defendants. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9392320 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Cook - County Where Action Arose: Wayne - County of 1st Defendant: Wayne. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A - First Loan Agreement, #3 Exhibit B - Second Loan Agreement, #4 Exhibit C - Third Loan Agreement, #5 Exhibit D - Fourth Loan Agreement, #6 Exhibit E - Michigan and Ohio Certificates of Title for the Collateral, #7 Exhibit F - Continuing Guaranties dated May 13, 2021, June 25, 2021, October 19, 2022, and November 14, 2022, in favor of Plaintiff evidencing the Guaranties, #8 Exhibit G - Plaintiffs Notice of Default and Acceleration to Borrower and Notice of Default Respecting Guaranty to Guarantor dated May 18, 2023, #9 Summons - Front 27 Inc, #10 Summons - Martin Zurevski) (Mayette, Anne) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.