Tachi-S Engineering U.S.A., Inc. v. Canoo Technologies Inc
| Tachi-S Engineering U.S.A., Inc. |
| Canoo Technologies Inc Doing business as EVelozcity Inc |
| 2:2023cv11548 |
| June 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Jonathan JC Grey |
| Curtis Ivy |
| Negotiable Instrument |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 REPLY to Response re #4 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss or Stay the Proceeding filed by Canoo Technologies Inc. (Cohen, Daniel) |
| Filing 7 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Tachi-S Engineering U.S.A., Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Tachi-S Co. LTD. for Tachi-S Engineering U.S.A., Inc.. (Hubbard, Brandon) |
| Filing 6 RESPONSE to #4 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss or Stay the Proceeding filed by Tachi-S Engineering U.S.A., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit A - Agreement Relating to Delivery of NASA Seats, #3 Exhibit B - Declaration of Graeme Stewart, #4 Exhibit C - Unpublished Decision(s)) (Hubbard, Brandon) |
| Filing 5 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Canoo Technologies Inc (Cohen, Daniel) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss or Stay the Proceeding by Canoo Technologies Inc. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit 1 - Declaration of Ramesh Murthy) (Cohen, Daniel) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Tachi-S Engineering U.S.A., Inc. (Hubbard, Brandon) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Canoo Technologies Inc* (DAll) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Tachi-S Engineering U.S.A., Inc. against Canoo Technologies Inc., f/k/a EVelozcity Inc.. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9400050 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Oakland - County Where Action Arose: Oakland - County of 1st Defendant: Out of State. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Hubbard, Brandon) |
| A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DAll) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Tachi-S Engineering U.S.A., Inc. v. Canoo Technologies Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tachi-S Engineering U.S.A., Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Brandon C. Hubbard |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Canoo Technologies Inc Doing business as EVelozcity Inc | |
| Represented By: | Daniel G. Cohen |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
