Andrews v. Progressive Residential Services
| Tonia Andrews |
| Progressive Residential Services |
| 2:2023cv11699 |
| July 17, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Kimberly G Altman |
| Jonathan JC Grey |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Race) |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 DISCOVERY plan jointly filed pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(f) (Batey, Scott) |
Filing 9
STIPULATION AND ORDER Adjourning the Scheduling Conference, ( Scheduling Conference reset for 9/20/2023 03:00 PM before District Judge Jonathan J.C. Grey) ***Parties are to file a FRCP 26(f) one week prior to conference. Signed by District Judge Jonathan J.C. Grey. (SOso)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO APPEAR IN PERSON: Scheduling Conference set for 9/14/2023 11:00 AM before District Judge Jonathan J.C. Grey ***Parties are to file FRCP 26(f) one week prior to conference*** (SOso) |
| Filing 7 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by All Defendants (Bradshaw-Tucker, Laura) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses with Jury Demand by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Document Continuation Affirmative Defenses) (Bradshaw-Tucker, Laura) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by All Defendants. (Bradshaw-Tucker, Laura) Modified on 8/11/2023 (SSch). [DOCUMENT INCOMPLETE. ATTORNEY TO REFILE] |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Daniel A. Gwinn appearing on behalf of All Defendants (Gwinn, Daniel) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Laura Katherine Bradshaw-Tucker appearing on behalf of Progressive Residential Services (Bradshaw-Tucker, Laura) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS Issued for *Progressive Residential Services* (NAhm) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Jury Demand filed by All Plaintiffs against All Defendants with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9419409 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Lucas - County Where Action Arose: Monroe - County of 1st Defendant: Monroe. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Batey, Scott) |
| A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (NAhm) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Andrews v. Progressive Residential Services | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tonia Andrews | |
| Represented By: | Scott P. Batey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Progressive Residential Services | |
| Represented By: | Daniel A. Gwinn |
| Represented By: | Laura Katherine Bradshaw-Tucker |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
