Joseph v. Orkin, LLC et al
| Raymond Frank Joseph |
| Orkin, LLC and Rollins, Inc. |
| 2:2023cv11824 |
| July 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Detroit Office |
| Curtis Ivy |
| Matthew F Leitman |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 RESPONSE to #2 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Response to Motion to Dismiss filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (O'Neill, James) |
Filing 3
ORDER Granting Plaintiff Leave to File a First Amended Complaint. Signed by District Judge Matthew F. Leitman. (HRya)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by All Defendants. (Edwards, Ian) |
| A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DAll) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Orkin, LLC from Oakland County Circuit Court, case number 23-201110-CK. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9433468 - Fee: $ 402 [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit Ex. A - Kelotra Declaration, #3 Exhibit Ex. B - Contractor Estimate) (Edwards, Ian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
