Parkman v. Artis
Fredeane Artis |
Mr. Dwuan Tamaul Parkman and Dwuan Tamaul Parkman |
2:2023cv11857 |
July 31, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Mark A Goldsmith |
Elizabeth A Stafford |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrea M. Christensen-Brown on behalf of Fredeane Artis. (Christensen-Brown, Andrea) |
Filing 3 ORDER Requiring Response to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus,. Attached Petition has been electronically served on the Michigan Attorney General and the Michigan Department of Corrections. Response due by 2/1/2024 Signed by Magistrate Judge David R. Grand. (Attachments: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus) (NAhm) |
Filing 2 EXHIBIT re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, by Dwuan Tamaul Parkman (Attachments: #1 Exhibit MI Supreme Court Order 5/3/2022) (Ashford, Linda) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Dwuan Tamaul Parkman against Dwuan Tamaul Parkman, Receipt No: AMIEDC-9437098 - Fee: $ 5. (Attachments: #1 Document Continuation Brief Supporting Habeas Petition, #2 Exhibit Michigan Court of Appeals Opinion, #3 Exhibit Michigan Court of Appeals Opinion After Remand) (Ashford, Linda) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/1/2023: #4 Cover Sheet) (NAhm). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.