GS Holistic, LLC v. In & Out 420, LLC et al
GS Holistic, LLC |
In & Out 420, LLC d/b/a Detroit Hookah, Mohammed Al Baadani, In & Out 420, LLC and Detroit Hookah Shop Inc |
2:2023cv11916 |
August 4, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Curtis Ivy |
Linda V Parker |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1121 Trademark Infringement |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued for *In & Out 420, LLC* (DAll) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Issued for *Mohammed Al Baadani* (DAll) |
A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (DAll) |
Filing 3 NOTICE by All Plaintiffs re #1 Complaint, #2 Patent/Copyright/Trademark Report Corporate Disclosure (Donohue, Thomas) |
Filing 2 Trademark Report Sent To Washington (Donohue, Thomas) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT 2:23-cv-11916 filed by All Plaintiffs against All Defendants. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9443667 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Out of State - County Where Action Arose: Wayne - County of 1st Defendant: Wayne. [Previously dismissed case: No] (Donohue, Thomas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.