Merity v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Plaintiff: Kennedy Merity
Defendant: Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2023cv12382
Filed: September 19, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: David R. Grand
Referring Judge: Jonathan JC Grey
Nature of Suit: Contract: Recovery/Enforcement
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 15, 2023 Filing 10 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Kennedy Merity (Ukpabi, Paschal)
November 13, 2023 Filing 9 NOTICE TO APPEAR REMOTELY: Scheduling Conference set for 11/27/2023 03:30 PM before District Judge Jonathan J.C. Grey (Attachments: #1 Document Continuation) ***Parties are to file FRCP 26(f) one week prior to conference*** (SOso) Modified on 11/13/2023 (SOso).
November 10, 2023 Filing 8 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Midland Credit Management, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Encore Capital Group, Inc. for Midland Credit Management, Inc.. (Seitz, Theodore)
November 10, 2023 Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses with Jury Demand by Midland Credit Management, Inc.. (Seitz, Theodore)
October 23, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 STIPULATED ORDER Extending Time to Respond to Plaintiff's #1 Complaint, ( Response due by 11/10/2023). Signed by District Judge Jonathan J.C. Grey. (SOso)
October 20, 2023 Filing 5 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Hannah E Buzolits appearing on behalf of Midland Credit Management, Inc. (Buzolits, Hannah)
October 20, 2023 Filing 4 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Theodore W. Seitz appearing on behalf of Midland Credit Management, Inc. (Seitz, Theodore)
September 20, 2023 Filing 3 SUMMONS Issued for *Midland Credit Management, Inc.* (NAhm)
September 20, 2023 A United States Magistrate Judge of this Court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636c and FRCP 73. The Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form is available for download at #http://www.mied.uscourts.gov (NAhm)
September 19, 2023 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Paschal E.C. Ukpabi on behalf of Kennedy Merity. (Ukpabi, Paschal)
September 19, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Kennedy Merity against Kennedy Merity with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9495209 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Wayne - County Where Action Arose: Wayne County - County of 1st Defendant: San Diego. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Ukpabi, Paschal)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Merity v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kennedy Merity
Represented By: Paschal E.C. Ukpabi
Represented By: Paschal Ukpabi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Represented By: Hannah E Buzolits
Represented By: Theodore W. Seitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?