Maximus, Inc. v. Tyler
| Maximus, Inc. |
| Apryl Tyler and Apryl K Tyler [E-filer] |
| 2:2023cv12433 |
| September 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Sean F Cox |
| Curtis Ivy |
| Other Statutes: Arbitration |
| 09 U.S.C. ยง 1 U.S. Arbitration Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
NOTICE OF IN PERSON HEARING on #3 MOTION for Permanent Injunction Enjoining Defendant From Pursuing Claims Against Maximus Currently Pending Before The American Arbitration Association. Motion Hearing set for 1/25/2024 at 03:00 PM before District Judge Sean F. Cox (JMcC)
|
|
Filing 6
REPLY to Response re #3 MOTION for Permanent Injunction Enjoining Defendant From Pursuing Claims Against Maximus Currently Pending Before The American Arbitration Association filed by Maximus, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Adam S. Forman in Further Support, #2 Exhibit 1 to Forman Declaration) (Pope, John)
|
|
Filing 5
RESPONSE to #3 MOTION for Permanent Injunction Enjoining Defendant From Pursuing Claims Against Maximus Currently Pending Before The American Arbitration Association Objection to Enjoining Claims Pending Arbitration filed by Apryl K Tyler [E-filer]. (Attachments: #1 Document Continuation objection brief, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit Exhibit 7, #9 Exhibit Exhibit 8, #10 Exhibit Exhibit 9, #11 Exhibit Exhibit 10, #12 Exhibit Exhibit 11, #13 Exhibit Exhibit 12, #14 Exhibit Exhibit 13, #15 Exhibit Exhibit 14, #16 Exhibit Exhibit 15, #17 Exhibit Exhibit 16, #18 Exhibit Exhibit 17, #19 Exhibit Exhibit 18, #20 Exhibit Exhibit 19, #21 Exhibit Exhibit 20, #22 Exhibit Exhibit 21, #23 Exhibit Exhibit 22, #24 Exhibit Exhibit 23, #25 Exhibit Exhibit 24, #26 Exhibit Exhibit 25, #27 Exhibit Exhibit 26, #28 Document Continuation proof of service) (Tyler [E-filer], Apryl)
|
|
Filing 4
SUMMONS Issued for *Apryl Tyler* (DAll)
|
|
Pro Se E-filing Access Given to Apryl K Tyler [E-filer]. (KBro)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Permanent Injunction Enjoining Defendant From Pursuing Claims Against Maximus Currently Pending Before The American Arbitration Association by Maximus, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Nathalie Ohanian in Support of Motion, #2 Declaratoin of Adriana Kosovych in Support of Motion, #3 Exhibit 1 - Demand for Arbitration, #4 Exhibit 2 - Amended Demand, #5 Exhibit 3 - Clarification of Claims, #6 Exhibit 4 - Interim Order Regarding Jurisdiction, #7 Exhibit 5 - Interim Order Regarding Potential Default of Maximus, #8 Exhibit 6 - Second Arbitration Mangement Conference Order, #9 Exhibit 7 - Arbitrator Schwartz Email 9-11-23) (Pope, John)
|
|
Filing 2
STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Maximus, Inc. identifying Other Affiliate BlackRock, Inc., Other Affiliate The Vanguard Group, Other Affiliate Victory Capital Management for Maximus, Inc.. (Pope, John)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by Maximus, Inc. against Apryl Tyler. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-9502840 - Fee: $ 402. County of 1st Plaintiff: Fairfax - County Where Action Arose: Oakland - County of 1st Defendant: Oakland. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): None] (Pope, John)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
